Smoke taint should qualify as bushfire damage: vigneron

Danielle Cetinski
Updated February 2 2020 - 6:01pm, first published 5:00pm
RECOVERY IN PROGRESS: De Salis winemaker Charlie Svenson says the effects of losing two vineyards of grapes to smoke taint in 2018 are still being felt. Photo: JUDE KEOGH
RECOVERY IN PROGRESS: De Salis winemaker Charlie Svenson says the effects of losing two vineyards of grapes to smoke taint in 2018 are still being felt. Photo: JUDE KEOGH

SMOKE taint should be recognised as bushfire damage to help winemakers cope with years of lost income, according to one of Orange's vignerons.

Subscribe now for unlimited access.

$0/

(min cost $0)

or signup to continue reading

See subscription options
Danielle Cetinski

Danielle Cetinski

Central Western Daily senior journalist

Danielle started at the Kiama Independent in 2010 before moving to the Central Western Daily in 2014. She covers council, court, politics, general news and business, and elections are her favourite time of the year. Got a tip? Email danielle.cetinski@centralwesterndaily.com.au

Get the latest Orange news in your inbox

Sign up for our newsletter to stay up to date.

We care about the protection of your data. Read our Privacy Policy.