News 
 Local News 
 News 
 General 
 Water security or pipeline the $18m question 

Water security or pipeline the $18m question

08 Nov, 2011 03:00 AM
OPPONENTS of the Macquarie pipeline want the state government to confirm once and for all that $18 million in funding for Orange City Council is not specifically for the pipeline.

Inland Waterways Rejuvenation Association president Matt Hansen says the government needs to remove all doubt about whether the money it has allocated for Orange’s water security can be spent on projects other than the pipeline.

It follows recent statements by member for Orange Andrew Gee that the money is for general water security projects, and is not tied to the pipeline.

Orange City Council has countered this claim with advice from the NSW Office of Water saying the money is only for the pipeline.

“[Greens MLC] Jeremy Buckingham has already asked the question, as has Andrew Gee, but Orange City Council has continued to maintain the money is just for the pipeline,” Mr Hansen said.

“We want an official answer from [Primary Industries Minister] Katrina Hodgkinson because it would be nice to find out what the truth is.”

Shooters and Fishers Party MLC Robert Brown is expected to ask the government again what the money is for in Parliament this week.

Anti-pipeline groups have also formalised their alliance to campaign together against the project.

The Orange and Region Water Security Alliance is made up of the Orange Ratepayers Association, the Friends of the Macquarie River, the Inland Rivers Network, the Inland Waterways Rejuvenation Association and the Environmentally Concerned Citizens of Orange.

The alliance said it wants the council to complete its Integrated Water Cycle Catchment Management Strategy, as required under state policy, before making further progress on the pipeline.

The Central Western Daily asked Mrs Hodgkinson’s office if the money was only for the pipeline.

“The NSW government has committed $18.2 million towards the Macquarie pipeline project, as agreed with Orange City Council and the federal government,” Ms Hodgkinson said.

“If Orange City Council’s priorities change and they no longer wish to pursue the pipeline project, the NSW government funding will remain committed to water security projects in the region.”

lisa.cox@ruralpress.co m

Print
Increase Text Size
Decrease Text Size

comments


Date: Newest first | Oldest first
Lets hope if the pipelines does not go ahead work can begin on raising the Suma Park dam wall.
Posted by Woteva, 8/11/2011 3:58:17 AM, on Central Western Daily
OCC had better be telling the truth regarding the allocation of funds for water security , otherwise I think they had better head for the hills . Maybe they should regardless !!
Posted by BOBBA, 8/11/2011 7:02:01 AM, on Central Western Daily
It looks like the last two paragraphs confirm the funding is appropraite for whatever water security project the council elects to proceed with.

It is not specifically for the pipeline option, giving us hope the council will actually examine options that require lower levels of capital and ongoing maintenance.

What is the fixation on pipes? Surely our elected councillors can think?

Posted by Gazzas, 8/11/2011 8:55:36 AM, on Central Western Daily
This is going to take a long time.

Call me in twenty years.

Posted by sentry, 8/11/2011 9:51:58 AM, on Central Western Daily
The big problem is that neither the pipeline nor raising the wall are viable options.
Posted by gary, 8/11/2011 2:47:41 PM, on Central Western Daily
Federal and State contractual funding agreements are never open ended. They always reference a specific project or items and are explicit on what funds can be used for, enforced by reporting and potentially an audit.

Without a doubt the funds committed were intended for the Macquarie project, and should Council change there priorities I would get it in writing that the funds will be transposed in full to the new project.


Posted by Axiom, 9/11/2011 8:25:36 AM, on Central Western Daily
I would like to suggest all OCC councilors travel to

the proposed extraction point at GARDENERS Waterhole and see for themselves what a beautiful spot the pipeline ,if it goes ahead,would ruin.Not only is it envionmental vandalism,but the engineering problems in my opinion,would be great and expensive.

I think that before committing the ratepayers of Orange to this pipeline,the councilors should be familior with the project themselves,

and not totally depend on staff advice.

Rick Burns


Posted by Rick Burns, 9/11/2011 10:34:15 AM, on Central Western Daily

post a comment


Screen name  *
Email address  *
Remember me?
Comment  *
 
We invite and encourage our readers to post comments. Comments are moderated and will appear as soon as our editor has approved them. When posting comments you agree to be bound by our Terms and Conditions.

Most popular articles


Ryans Caravans
 


Central Western Daily







Weather brought to you by:

Weatherzone

Front Page

Current Issue
Privacy Policy | Conditions of Use | Advertising Terms | Copyright © 2012. Fairfax Media.
 SEND...
 SAVE...
 SHARE...