News 
 Local News 
 News 
 General 
 Mayor slams crossing but there are no plans for change 

Mayor slams crossing but there are no plans for change

23 Dec, 2008 07:40 AM
ORANGE City Council says it has no plans to rip out the newly built Anson Street pedestrian crossing despite mounting calls for it to do so.

A chorus of critics made up of pedestrians, motorists, taxi drivers and even councillors continue to savage the crossing more than three months after it was built.

Many said the mayhem it has caused is likely to trigger a serious accident rather than prevent one.

Mayor Reg Kidd also voiced his dissatisfaction after viewing the crossing in action for several hours yesterday.

Cr Kidd candidly said it was obvious almost everyone who uses Anson Street “now well and truly has the sh ... with the thing”.

“What we have there is a crazy mixture of traffic and pedestrian facilities that have been placed with the best intentions but the fact is those bits and pieces have congested the area even more,” he said.

“Not one person who uses the thing is happy with how it’s working and the frustration people have just exacerbates what’s happening.”

Orange City Council communications and public relations manager Nick Redmond said council had no plans to remove the crossing despite the community’s dissatisfaction.

“To suggest that not having a pedestrian crossing there would make the area safer is unrealistic,” Mr Redmond said.

“Its intention was to make it safer for pedestrians and that’s what the crossing has done.”

Mr Redmond rejected suggestions newly installed signs that ask pedestrians to give consideration to motorists and cross in groups sent mixed messages considering pedestrians had the legal right of way at any pedestrian crossing.

“Even if people could pair up and go across together that would help out, it won’t change things dramatically but that’s not the expectation we have,” he said.

Consultants are reviewing the operation of the entire Anson Street area of the central business district and are expected to report their findings to councillors early next year.

Print
Increase Text Size
Decrease Text Size

comments


Date: Newest first | Oldest first
One more thing: That sign is ridiculous.
Posted by grant, 23/12/2008 9:16:49 AM
I'm not sure that my first submitted comment went through successfully, here it is again...: From a pedestrians point of view I can't see anything to complain about. It is now more convenient and safer to cross between the shopping centres. From a drivers point of view I think the message is clear: this block of Anson St is congested avoid driving here unless you have to. This is not hard to do. I can understand why the split taxi rank causes problems for taxi drivers and their customers. For cyclists it's an advantage, slower traffic means safer riding. Any possible change should keep an excellent pedestrian crossing and deterrent for motorists while making it easier for taxi drivers and their customers. Perhaps they should make the Anson St Woolies' car park access driveway 'exit only' (no cars allowed to enter). This would stop cars queuing over the crossing to get in and make it safer for pedestrians on the crossing and on the driveway. Grant
Posted by grant, 23/12/2008 9:37:26 AM
I thought closing that section of Anson St was a better idea. In fact why not close the centre of town down altogether? (think Wollongong) One way Byng st and Kite st's around the centre of town. Improve parking on the perifery. Imagine the improved environment in the centre of town.
Posted by Stu, 23/12/2008 9:51:52 AM
Contrary to the message in your article and the Mayor's opinion, I support the crossing as finally Orange Council has stood up and done something positive for pedestrians- a rare event in Orange with its many roundabouts. This part of the CBD, including the infamous Woolies carpark (particularly the Anson St entrance/exit) is a pedestrian nightmare- as most of the residents of Orange know but apparently have difficulty identifying based on the comments in your article. If drivers (taxis excepted) had the common sense to avoid this area, particularly at this time of the year, the congestion and stresses would be significantly reduced and all would be a lot happier. After all its the time for happiness and good cheer! It can only be hoped that the consultants report places some priority on pedestrian movement and safety, and not only for the Anson St area.
Posted by Paul, 23/12/2008 3:43:13 PM
Has anyone considered the option of relocating the taxi rank? Some sort of crossing there is needed; the rank, in that precise location, is not.
Posted by Dancin' on Anson, 23/12/2008 5:12:12 PM
Here's an answer. Turn the whole bloody street into a mall by making a taxi rank near the shoe store, and still allowing the exit from the car park into Anson St. That way everyone can still get a cab and cars can leave Woolies. The rest of us can enjoy a tree lined street with cafe's, market stalls and all the other refinements that a town like Orange needs to stay vibrant.
Posted by Carlos Montoya, 24/12/2008 12:08:29 AM
Signs. That's all fine and well for literate people. What about me? (My cat typed this). Furthermore, since when did the laws of NSW roads give traffic precedence over pedestrians? Not ever, that's when. But since Orange is filled with young (and not so young) idiots behind the wheels of cars, that feel they need to be wherever they're going to before they even began their journey, we walkers must all bow down that GOD OF ORANGE, THE CAR!!!
Posted by watta-what, 24/12/2008 12:41:29 AM

post a comment


Screen name  *
Email address  *
Remember me?
Comment  *
 
We invite and encourage our readers to post comments. Comments are moderated and will appear as soon as our editor has approved them. When posting comments you agree to be bound by our Terms and Conditions.
SIGN LANGUAGE: The signage at the Anson Street pedestrian crossing.
SIGN LANGUAGE: The signage at the Anson Street pedestrian crossing.

Most popular articles

Domain - search for local real estate agent
 SEND...
 SAVE...
 SHARE...