News 
 Local News 
 News 
 General 
 Don’t drive until 2045 

Don’t drive until 2045

01 Jun, 2009 08:51 AM
A 34-year-old man will not be able to legally drive until he is 70 after he appeared in Orange Local Court last week charged with driving while disqualified from holding a licence.

Michael Denis Wiggins had already been disqualified until 2040 for previous offences when police caught him driving on the Mitchell Highway at Wellington on the morning of January 9.

He was stopped because his car’s registration had expired.

Wiggins, a declared habitual traffic offender, was disqualified for a further five years by Magistrate Terry Lucas and sentenced to an 18 month suspended term of imprisonment.

Wiggins told the court it was the first time he had driven in three years.

Solicitor Peter Ringbauer said his client and his partner had seven children and had recently relocated from Orange to Coonamble.

“He made the incorrect and illegal decision to drive a motor vehicle. He has disposed of his car. He knows he’s not allowed to drive. He’s able to do occasional work but he realises he cannot drive for any reason,” he said.

Magistrate Terry Lucas said Wiggins would not be able to avoid jail if he was caught again.

“If you get caught driving again, you’ll go to jail. Don’t let me or the community down,” he said.

Local barrister Bill Walsh told the Central Western Daily the courts had no choice when it came to people who routinely disobeyed orders not to drive, with mandatory disqualification periods applying.

“My experience as both a police officer and a lawyer is that a lot of people can’t keep their hands off the steering wheel. If people continue to drive while disqualified, it’s in contempt of a court order,” he said.

A mandatory disqualification period of 12 months applies to anyone convicted of driving while their licence has been disqualified if it is a first offence.

Mr Walsh said his greatest concern about the mandatory disqualification periods was that the penalty was much greater for people in rural and regional areas.

“That is perhaps where there is an unfairness. It affects their livelihood. In Sydney you can just get on a bus or train and go to work. It’s not in the interests of society that people lose their jobs,” he said.

Print
Increase Text Size
Decrease Text Size

comments


Date: Newest first | Oldest first
Wow! 36 years disqualification for this and yet there have been numerous cases the past 5 years where people have been habitual drink drivers with very high alcohol readings, even killed other motorists and pedestrians yet get 2 years disqualification. We have even seen cases where people get caught, never had a license in their life and STILL get 1-2 years driving disqualification. You can't take away what they don't have in the first place. I totally agree with Mr Walsh when he says "...that the penalty was much greater for people in rural and regional areas." We have no trains, trams, buses etc to get to work and those who work on farms can't be expected to peddle a bike that far in the freezing cold and wet.
Posted by MareeK., 1/06/2009 12:30:46 PM

post a comment


Screen name  *
Email address  *
Remember me?
Comment  *
 
We invite and encourage our readers to post comments. Comments are moderated and will appear as soon as our editor has approved them. When posting comments you agree to be bound by our Terms and Conditions.

Most popular articles

Domain - search for local real estate agent
 SEND...
 SAVE...
 SHARE...